Wednesday, November 24, 2004

Sorry TCO and other assorted folks. I still am mucho busy and haven't time to compile my thoughts on the '06 races.

I'll do it sometime, but not likely any time soon...

Sorry.

Thursday, November 11, 2004

I'm still around, but barely. I've gotten way too busy lately to type up a 2006 summary, but it should be here sometime. Don't worry - we've got two years to pundate on those races!

Thursday, November 04, 2004

Prediction Analysis Wrap-up

Well, at last the election is over. My predictions (posted last Saturday here) held up very well against the final results – much better than many of the left-wing blogs and media pundits predicted a break even result of better for the Dems – and, had I decided to amend my results due to my suspicions on Monday, I would have scored every single race right. But, alas, the caution that I have been taught throughout doing this blog convinced me otherwise. So, in all, I was 32 for 34 on the night.

I predicted the final net gain precisely at GOP +4, which, of course, was the final result. The Senate going into the 109th Congress will be 55-44-1 for the Republicans. I did pretty well in picking several spreads, too. But enough gloating. Let's go through every single race and my predictions, and maybe I can learn something for 2006:

Each race has a nifty table that shows my prediction and the final result. The bottom row shows whether my predicted winner actually won, and then the difference between my predicted margin and the final margin (negative means my picked candidate underperformed the prediction, positive, of course, means the opposite).

Alabama
PredictedShelby by 65+%
ResultsShelby 68%-32%
OverallYesMargin-29%


  • My most horrifically wrong call. I severely overestimated Shelby's popularity in this state and severely underestimated the number of straight-ticket Democratic voters. In fact, this occurred in many of the safe-incumbent races that had not been polled all season. Guessing at the margin in those races was basically a shot in the dark, and I generally overstated their margin of victory, underestimating the number of straight-ticket opposition party voters. Ah, well, such are the follies of politics.

    Alaska
    PredictedKnowles 48%-47%
    ResultsMurkowski 49%-45%
    OverallNoMargin-5%


  • What can I say? This one surprised me. There were very, very few polls of this race, so there was little to gauge Murkowski's support from. Assuming the KTUU polls to have been correct at the time, I underestimated the strength of Murkowski's late charge and overestimated Knowles' support. Funny - I was calling this race for Murkowski throughout the whole election season, citing Alaska's extremely conservative roots as my basis and effectively ignoring the polls until the end, when I finally bowed to the polls, and guess what? The polls were wrong. Alas, live and learn.

    Arizona
    PredictedMcCain by 60+%
    ResultsMcCain 76%-21%
    OverallYesMargin+5%


  • I should say I did fairly well on this one...

    Arkansas
    PredictedLincoln by 20%
    ResultsLincoln 56%-44%
    OverallYesMargin-8%


  • Once again, overstating the incumbent's support, although many polls showed this race wider before the election.

    California
    PredictedBoxer by 17%
    ResultsBoxer 58%-38%
    OverallYesMargin+3%


  • Likewise, little to say here. Boxer outperformed the final polls slightly, but not by much. My prediction was close.

    Colorado
    PredictedCoors 49%-48%
    ResultsSalazar 51%-47%
    OverallNoMargin-5%


  • Whereas conservative Alaska carried Murkowski to victory, Colorado is apparently just not conservative enough to lift Pete Coors to a win. The problem here was not, like Alaska, a lack of polls, but too many polls that disagreed with each other. In the days leading up to the election, polls literally alternated showing Salazar and Coors ahead. In the end, I simply relied too much on Colorado's Republican base to turn-out.

    Connecticut
    PredictedDodd by 47%
    ResultsDodd 66%-32%
    OverallYesMargin-13%


  • See Alabama. Another clear case of overstating a safe incumbent's support.

    Florida
    PredictedMartinez 50%-49%
    ResultsMartinez 50%-48%
    OverallYesMargin+1%


  • I do wish I had gone to Vegas on this one. I had folks e-mailing yelling at me that Florida was going to elect Castor. Bologna, I say. Really, calling it for Martinez was all that was needed - everyone knew it would be close, so the margin of victory was basically a given. I still think I did pretty well picking the final totals, though.

    Georgia
    PredictedIsakson by 21%
    ResultsIsakson 58%-40%
    OverallYesMargin-3%


  • Isakson, while outperforming the latest polls of the race, underperformed my predictions. No matter, as I was fairly close.

    Hawaii
    PredictedInouye by 60+%
    ResultsInouye 76%-21%
    OverallYesMargin+5%


  • No comments. A fairly good prediction for a race with no polls, yes? Or at least a fairly lucky one...

    Idaho
    PredictedCrapo by 95+%
    ResultsCrapo w/ 99%
    OverallYesMargin-4%


  • It must be immensely satisfying for Crapo to know that he won with 99% of the vote. I thought it nearly impossible to overperform this prediction, but, when one's only opponent is a write-in candidate, anything's possible.

    Illinois
    PredictedObama by 48+%
    ResultsObama 70%-27%
    OverallYesMargin-5%


  • I am proud that I was able to call such a wide-open race so well, although surely I was helped by the fact that there were about seventeen polls more of this race than anyone wanted or needed. Obama performed very nearly at the average of all the recent polls of this race.

    Indiana
    PredictedBayh by 33+%
    ResultsBayh 62%-37%
    OverallYesMargin-8%


  • Off a bit. Eh...

    Iowa
    PredictedGrassley by 40+%
    ResultsGrassley 70%-28
    OverallYesMargin+2%


  • See Indiana.

    Kansas
    PredictedBrownback by 65+%
    ResultsBrownback 69%-28%
    OverallYesMargin-21%


  • Off only slightly more. See Alabama - there were no polls of this one either.

    Kentucky
    PredictedBunning 52%-43%
    ResultsBunning 51%-49%
    OverallYesMargin-7%


  • This one was scary. Kentucky, at 7PM EDT, was one of the first states to close its polls, and as the first results started coming in, Mongiardo led approximately 60-40. Could this be a harbinger of impending Democratic blowout? Nay. The first returns were from eastern, urban, heavily Democratic Kentucky. As western and northern Kentucky returns came in, Bunning closed the gap. Although the margin was certainly smaller than he'd like it to be and far smaller than my prediction, Bunning pulled it out in the end.

    Louisiana
    PredictedVitter w/ 52%
    ResultsVitter w/ 51%
    OverallYesMargin-1%


  • Did I not tell you that Vitter would win without a run-off? Ah yes, I believe I did. I mispredicted John's and Kennedy's totals, understating and overstating their support levels, respectively, but it really matters not, as the race is over for good now.

    Maryland
    PredictedMikulski by 30+%
    ResultsMikulski 65%-34%
    OverallYesMargin+1%


  • Very good prediction for a race with no polls. Sometimes you just get lucky...

    Missouri
    PredictedBond by 25+%
    ResultsBond 56%-43%
    OverallYesMargin-12%


  • This race turned out much closer than nearly any poll had shown it to be. I have no idea why and no excuses to make. Bond still won, and by 12 points. Moving on...

    Nevada
    PredictedReid by 31+%
    ResultsReid 61%-35%
    OverallYesMargin-5%


  • No comments.

    New Hampshire
    PredictedGregg by 40+%
    ResultsGregg 66%-34%
    OverallYesMargin-8%


  • No comments.

    New York
    PredictedSchumer by 47+%
    ResultsSchumer 71%-25%
    OverallYesMargin-1%


  • A very good prediction, Josh. Very well done. You deserve a prize. I was a bit off on my second prediction (of Schumer leading 35% over Mills and O'Grady) as O'Grady polled just 3% of the vote, but still - very well done. ;)

    North Carolina
    PredictedBurr 50%-47%
    ResultsBurr 52%-47%
    OverallYesMargin+2%


  • I seem to remember saying, in the very first article, that although Bowles led in early polls by 9 or 10 points, Burr would likely come back and win this seat. I was right. Not only was I right, but I very nearly got the margin, too. I feel so special.

    North Dakota
    PredictedDorgan by 60+%
    ResultsDorgan 68%-32%
    OverallYesMargin-24%


  • What can I say? See Alabama.

    Ohio
    PredictedVoinovich by 26+%
    ResultsVoinovich 64%-36%
    OverallYesMargin+2%


  • See what you can do with polls? The number of polls of this race was horribly disproportionate to its competitiveness, but did help to call it much better.

    Oklahoma
    PredictedCoburn 49%-45%
    ResultsCoburn 53%-41%
    OverallYesMargin+8%


  • Wow. I knew that if Coburn was a slightly better candidate, he'd take this running away, but I had no idea that he would win by such a margin.

    Oregon
    PredictedWyden by 25+%
    ResultsWyden 63%-32%
    OverallYesMargin+6%


  • No comments.

    Pennsylvania
    PredictedSpecter by 16+%
    ResultsSpecter 53%-42%
    OverallYesMargin-5%


  • This race was similar to Kentucky, with early returns heavily favoring Hoeffel. They were the eastern, urban Pennsylvania returns, though, and with later returns Specter evened the race and eventually led by a significant margin, although underperforming many polls and my predictions.

    South Carolina
    PredictedDeMint 51%-41%
    ResultsDeMint 54%-44
    OverallYesMargin0%


  • Right on the dot. Sure the numbers weren't right on but I called the margin perfectly. Am I just the coolest or what?

    South Dakota
    PredictedThune 51%-48%
    ResultsThune 51%-49
    OverallYesMargin-1%


  • I have to get some points for this. Like Florida, it was bound to be close no matter who won, so the margin was a given. Tom Daschle is deeply, deeply saddened by these results, I'm sure.

    Utah
    PredictedBennett by 40+%
    ResultsBennett 68%-29%
    OverallYesMargin-1%


  • No comment, except to note how closely the polls called this one.

    Vermont
    PredictedLeahy by 55+%
    ResultsLeahy 71%-25%
    OverallYesMargin-9%


  • Slightly over-predicted, but few polls to work with. What do you expect?

    Washington
    PredictedMurray by 17%
    ResultsMurray 55%-43%
    OverallYesMargin-5%


  • In the end, it looks like Murray effectively split the difference between SV and the other pollsters.

    Wisconsin
    PredictedFeingold by 16%
    ResultsFeingold 56%-44%
    OverallYesMargin-4%


  • Rasmussen pegged this one best, and Zogby was WAAAY off. A fairly close call, in my opinion.

    Looking at the final results as a whole, I note two trends:

    1.In races with safe incumbents and few polls, it is generally difficult to call the exact margin. In many of these races, I underestimated the number of straight-ticket opposition voters. Without many polls of the races, predicting margins is a crapshoot. Still, I did alright on some of them.
    2.I tended to overestimate the effects of thrid-party and independent candidates. When doing the predictions, I researched on Politics1 to see if there were any other candidates, and many races had several, and I accounted between 2-3% for them. What I didn't know is that many weren't on the ballot, and so polled significantly fewer votes than expected. Bilyeu in OK did about as expected, though. This trend affected the races very little, and only threw off predictions by a couple of percent.

    So, out of all the races, my predictions turned out to be:

    Straight up: 32-2
    Against the spread*: 26-8

    In the 13 most competitive races (the ones given Race Pages) – the numbers in parentheses are for the nine listed as Toss-up or Leaning in the last update:

    Straight up: 11-2
    Against the spread*: 11-2

    * - Using a self-concocted analysis mechanism - when the predicted margin is under 20%, the difference between predicted and final must be 5% (a normal MoE in polls) or less to be considered a good prediction. When the predicted margin is over 20%, the difference must be within one-quarter the predicted margin.

    Alrighty, there you have it. Coming tomorrow (maybe): a look at the 2006 races, and then it's curtains for this blog.
  • Finally starting...

    ...the prediction wrap, if there's anyone still out there. Will be up tonight or tomorrow.

    Running...

    ...between about seven different things right now, but I'll try and have my prediction wrap tied up tonight.

    Also, a reader suggested perhaps a quick overview of the Senate races in 2006 and what can be expected in them before I close up shop here. Good idea, and if schedule allows, one I will pursue in earnest, before all the readers desert...

    Wednesday, November 03, 2004

    The Morning (slash Afternoon) After...

    Well, the masses have cast their vote, and I daresay I predicted the final results pretty well. Not quite as well as KivaCom, but better than most of the MSM pundits expecting a tightly drawn Senate late into the night (libby media indeed). I had meant to post this last night, but at 3AM I couldn't bring myself to do it, and early this morning was sleepy time until about five minutes before I needed to be to school.

    All in all, I do believe my predictions went pretty darn well...

    In the Presidential contest, I do believe I predicted a Bush victory with 51% of the popular vote and 296 EVs. With effectively all of the results in, Bush has, surprise, a 51% majority of the popular vote, and 286 EVs (included IA nad NM, which Bush has won, but the media refuse to acknowledge - although it really doesn't matter). I missed but one state in my predictions - Wisconsin, which I believed would go for the Prez. It was close, but my hopes/predictions didn't quite pan out. Still, 98% isn't bad, no?

    In the House, I predicted a GOP pick-up of 6 to 7 seats. I haven't been following individual races, and so was flying by the seat of my pants on a round number that was culled from various other sources following the races more closely. So I never really put a lot of faith in this prediction, and, frankly, never really cared, as the House was not leaving Republican control, and any gains would be token at best. But enough excuses. I have seen sites, from left to right, tallying the final net at break even to GOP +5. Fox News and CNN both have it at GOP +4, and it appears three races left to call. I'm checking those out shortly. Regardless, Democrats had decent showings in a few races nationwide, but nothing to be overly excited about, as they still lost overall net. Bean beat Crane in IL-8, a shocker to be sure, and Edwards held on in TX-17. Those two results alone held the GOP official gain down. Still, I was very close, and it remains clear that the GOP will have a sizable majority in the 109th Congress.

    I'll come back in a bit with the analysis of my Senate predictions and the final results.

    EDIT (on the third try (6:22 PM) - Blogger's being real finicky): I realized after I posted that I didn't even show the three races that were too close to call. The first is NY-27, a Republican-held open seat where the Democratic candidate looks to be just slightly squeaking by (the media's not called it - I think they've probably given up on calling anything altogether by now). That cuts the GOP net to +3. The other two are Louisiana seats headed to a run-off. One is a Republican-held open seat, LA-3; the other a Democratic-held (Chris John's seat), LA-7. Both had Republicans at the top in the final Election Night vote tallies, but history has shown that Louisiana run-off races cannot be very heavily judged by the November results. We can presume, though, that the Republicans will either hold one or sweep both, making the final GOP tally either +3 or +4. I wasn't off by much...

    Senate predictions analysis will be a bit later than expected, but is on its way...

    Tuesday, November 02, 2004

    After Months of Anticipation...

    ...the Day of Election is upon us. There will be no live-blogging the results from me tonight. I doubt I have the significant readership to justify such doings, and I'm still getting over this nasty influenza. I plan to plop down in the recliner about 3 o'clock and not move for 12 hours or so.

    But I'll be watching closely the returns and taking notes. Sometime soon, possible early tomorrow morning if I'm feeling motivated, tomorrow afternoon if I'm not, I'll have a rundown of the results and how they match up with my predictions. I'll thank everyone profusely, and then, barring a runoff in Louisiana, this blog will be dead to the world.

    In the meantime, KivaCom and MEA have predictions up, and for presidential predictions, the always-right Daly Thoughts provides us with the final result 12 hours early. RCP has slightly more polls up, but they really don't make a difference now...

    For the record, here are my predictions:

    Bush wins with 51% of the popular vote, 296 EVs.
    Senate GOP +4 to 55-45, as detailed earlier.
    House GOP +6-7, to whatever it is now plus six or seven...

    Months of punditry and pontificating have come down to this one day. It's bound to be an interesting night. I'll see y'all on the other side!

    2:42 PM Update: I can feel the tension running through the blogosphere right now. It's quite exciting. I forgot to mention previously - John J. Miller has his last-minute predictions up at NRO as well - I'm scanning them right now.

    Monday, November 01, 2004

    Time is running out...

    Apologies for the lack of posting the last coupla days. Went to the Bush rally yesterday in Gainesville, with Jeb, Laura, and Mel (<--first time I've actually seen the guy). Nearly 30,000 people showed, even in this liberal town (there were only a dozen or so token protestors).

    Then, overnight, I was promptly taken ill with what appears to be the flu. It's all Bush's fault, right? ;)

    Anyway, I've spent probably 85% of today in bed, and have been unable to post any new polls or amend my predictions. Just glancing at the polls on RCP, though, I see no reason to change my predictions. I'm less certain about my Florida, Colorado, and Alaska predictions, although at the moment I don't think there is a need to change them. If anything, Colorado and Alaska would switch, and the overall outcome would be the same.

    For those still looking for a poll fix, just go to RCP. I'm too out-of-it right now to post polls and update pages. Hopefully I'll be better before tomorrow night.

    Also, KivaCom and MEA have put up their final take on the races. Both are highly respectable and logical analyses, even if I disagree with their take on a few races, and I eagerly await KivaCom's take on the nine competitive races, coming tomorrow.

    Take care, all...

    Saturday, October 30, 2004

    FINAL PREDICTIONS

    Sorry for yelling. Here they are, the ultimate results of months of punditry, for your consumption.

    Senate Analysis 2004 – 11/1/04 Final Senate Race Predictions

    Over the past several months, I've followed the Senate races closely, noting every poll and watching every trend. I've made predictions and then rescinded them. I've made mistakes and occasionally shown some insight (odds are out as to which I've done more, though). As the election nears – just tomorrow, in fact, it's time for my final predictions.

    So, here they are. Not only am I predicting the winner of each race, I'm predicting the margin of victory – closer races have vote tally predictions, too – just to give me more chances to screw up (predictions for less competitive races will probably be off significantly – possibly 5-10 points or so – but I consider that much less egregious than mis-predicting a close toss-up race). I'll post after results are in tallying up my right-wrong record.

    By state, alphabetically:

    Alabama: Incumbent Richard Shelby faces only nominal opposition. This is one of several races that haven't even been polled this cycle. Shelby by 65+%.

    Alaska: This is possibly THE hardest race to call. If it were any other Republican candidate, this race wouldn't be close. If it were any other Democratic candidate, this race wouldn't be close. If it were in almost any other state, this race wouldn't be close. As it is, though, this race is a complete toss-up between Murkowski and Knowles.

    Still, all the polls to date have shown Knowles leading, and although Murkowski has regained a substantial amount of ground, I don't know if she'll be able to pull back up to even or better by Election Day. Bush's coattails may help slightly, but I doubt many Alaskans will be hesitant to cast a split ticket. Third party candidates will probably siphon a few Republican votes, providing the final blow to Murkowski. I'm predicting a Knowles win, ever-so-slightly, 48%-47%, and he will quite likely be unseated in 2010 by a much less vulnerable and much more conservative Republican candidate. Dem. Takeover.

    Arizona: John McCain is well-liked by many, and his opposition is faint. No polls are available of this race either. He'll be back for another term. McCain by 60+%.

    Arkansas: Republicans were hoping to overturn Blanche Lincoln, but it's unlikely. One poll showed her challenger within 14 points, but that's the closest he's gotten, and her margin has widened substantially since then. Lincoln by 20%.

    California: Incumbent Barbara Boxer faced significant opposition from Bill Jones, but in liberal California, he was never able to gain footing, and Boxer's lead has only widened as of late. Boxer by 17%.

    Colorado: Next to Alaska, this is the hardest race to call. Ken Salazar is a very strong, centrist Democratic candidate, and has polled very well throughout the campaign, but oddball polls have been prevalent here, and I'm not sure which one to trust. Flipping a coin, I see Coors with the momentum and, with a 50% chance of being wrong, am predicting he will keep this seat Republican, 49%-48%.

    Connecticut: Incumbent Chris Dodd faced little opposition. The latest poll had him up by 45, and he will likely exceed that margin on Election Day. Dodd by 47+%.

    Florida: Florida is one of few presidential swing states also with a competitive Senate race this year, and both candidates seem to be aligning themselves with their party's presidential pick. I expect the result of the Senate race to be closely tied to the presidential results, and there will probably be very few cross-over votes.

    With that said, then, polls have shown this race clearly very close throughout the campaign. Lately, though, Mel Martinez seems to have opened up a significant margin, leading in almost all recent polls. There are very few undecideds left in this race, and I believe the final result will be quite similar to recent polls, with the few undecideds breaking fairly evenly. I'm picking Martinez to win 50%-49%. Rep. Takeover.

    Georgia: The fate of Zell Miller's seat was never really in question. Johnny Isakson has led for the entire campaign, and although his lead has shrunken slightly as of late, he will still cruise to a significant victory. Isakson by 21%. Rep. Takeover.

    Hawaii: Incumbent Dan Inouye, along with having one of the strangest names in the Senate, has had little trouble in this election. No polls have been taken of this race, and none are really needed, although with the interesting state of affairs in the presidential race in HI, this race may be slightly closer than expected. Inouye by 60+%.

    Idaho: Senator Mike Crapo does not have a Democratic challenger, and I'm not sure if this race will even be on the ballot. Crapo by 95+%.

    Illinois: Ever since Barack Obama's stunning keynote at the DNC, and the decision of the IL GOP to import Alan Keyes as their candidate, this race has been quite unexciting. Obama by 48+%. Dem. Takeover.

    Indiana: Incumbent Evan Bayh has faced little contest, and will be back for another term. Bayh by 33+%.

    Iowa: Incumbent Chuck Grassley has faced only small opposition, and will be back in DC for another term. Grassley by 40+%.

    Kansas: Incumbent Sam Brownback has had little contest in this race, and no polls are even available for it. Brownback by 65+%.

    Kentucky: One of the dark-horse contests after Senator Bunning's erratic behavior of late, Democrats became suddenly enthused, and left-wing sites listed this race as a possible takeover after a partisan poll showed the race tied. State Senator Dan Mongiardo has made a valiant effort and gotten several breaks in this race, but will probably not be able to make it all the way in this conservative state, although he will make it much closer than anyone would have predicted three months ago. Bunning, 52%-43%.

    Louisiana: I absolutely refuse to explain LA's election system again. If you're reading this, you should know about it. With that said, I've been vocally predicting all along that Vitter could get through this one without a runoff, and I still think I'm right. Recent polls have him between 48 and 51 percent, and over 10% of all voters are undecided. A majority of the undecideds are likely undecided between Democratic candidates, but nonetheless it should not be hard for Vitter to pick up a few points.

    I'm predicting Vitter becomes Louisiana's first Republican senator, polling slightly north of 52% on Election Day, with Chris John winning the race for useless second with 23%, Kennedy with 20%, and Arthur Morell with 3% or so. Rep. Takeover.

    Maryland: Incumbent Barbara Mikulski will cruise to another term by a considerable margin. Mikulski by 30+%.

    Missouri: Earlier this cycle, Senator Kit Bond looked vulnerable to the DSCC, and many started pouring money into Nancy Farmer's campaign, hoping to effect an upset. Unfortunately, Bond's vulnerability never developed, and he has led significantly throughout the campaign, and will walk to another term. Bond by 25+%.

    Nevada: Likewise in Nevada, Republicans were optimistic about defeating sitting Assistant Minority Leader Harry Reid, but a disappointing primary field drowned any prospects of an upset. Reid by 31+%.

    New Hampshire: Incumbent Judd Gregg will cruise over his 81-year-old opponent, Doris “Granny D” Haddock. Gregg by 40+%.

    New York: Chuck Schumer is facing two major opponents, one from the Republican Party, another from the Conservative Party of New York. It won't matter, as he'll crush both of them. Schumer by 47+% over his nearest opponent, 35+% over the combined total of both.

    North Carolina: Back in the summer, Erskine Bowles maintained a significant lead in this race to replace John Edwards. I predicted then that not only would the race tighten, but his opponent, Richard Burr would come back and eventually win the race. So far, it appears my prediction will hold. Burr has led in six of the last eight polls, with the other two showing a tie. It will still be close, but I'm predicting a Burr win here, 50%-47%. Rep. Takeover.

    North Dakota: Incumbent Byron Dorgan has faced little opposition, and no polls have been taken of this race. Dorgan by 60+%.

    Ohio: The Ohio race has been polled substantially, but only because the state is a major presidential battleground. Challenger Eric Fingerhut has been unable to pick up steam, and Incumbent George Voinovich will cruise to a second term. Voinovich by 26+%.

    Oklahoma: This race should never have really been close. If you look at the polling trends, Coburn led for most of the summer, which melted into a solid Carson lead for most of the fall, and has only recently, in the past several weeks, come back to a steady Coburn lead. Coburn, like DeMint in SC, has a nasty habit of shooting off his mouth when it would be politically expedient to shut up, which has hurt him significantly. He could probably be leading by ten points if it weren't for some stupid comments he's made.

    Don't count out Sheila Bilyeu's impact on the race, either. The left-wing wacko has polled upwards of 5%, which would assumably have gone to Carson otherwise, perhaps making the difference in the race.

    This race is hard to call numerically due to the large amount of undecideds still left, even a few days before the Election. I'm guessing they break about 3-out-of-5 for Carson, and Coburn pulls it out 49%-45%, with Bilyeu picking off 5%.

    Oregon: Incumbent Ron Wyden will cruise to a second term. Wyden by 25+%.

    Pennsylvania: Democrats were quite optimistic about defeating incumbent Arlen Specter, particularly after a divisive fight in the Republican primary, but their hopes have failed to pan out. Specter has rarely polled below a double-digit lead, and will win re-election by a significant margin. Specter by 16+%.

    South Carolina: Previously in the season, this race was considered to be, alongside Georgia, an assured Republican takeover. Jim DeMint led by double digits for most of the summer. However, as the race heated up, he made a few off-color comments, and suddenly the race tightened.


    However, he never once lost the lead in non-partisan polls, and to this day enjoys a significant advantage. I'm predicting a DeMint win, 51%-41% over Tenenbaum. Rep. Takeover.

    South Dakota: The sitting leader of either party should never be in electoral trouble. Not since the '50s has one been defeated in his re-election bid. Tom Daschle, the Senate Minority Leader, is up for re-election this year, and is being faced by John Thune, a former Representative. Thune lost to Tim Johnson, SD's other Senator, by just a few hundred votes in 2002.

    Throughout the campaign, polls have been fairly sparse, and the lead has flip-flopped back and forth among the non-partisan polls. This race is quite clearly a complete toss-up, but Thune has been gaining momentum lately, and South Dakota is, I think, ready for a change. I'm picking Thune to knock off Daschle by a significant margin, 51%-48%. Rep. Takeover.

    Utah: I'm running out of ways to say the incumbent has faced little to no opposition and will be re-elected. Incumbent Bennett by 40+%.

    Vermont: Ditto on the Utah comment. Incumbent Leahy by 55+%.

    Washington: In Washington, Republicans had high hopes of knocking off Patty Murray, and recruited a decent, if not exemplary, candidate for the job in Rep. George Nethercutt. Nethercutt, however, has been unable to gain the advantage, and has never polled within close range of Murray. She will be re-elected by a very un-close margin. Murray by 17%.

    Wisconsin: Likewise, the NRSC hoped to defeat incumbent Russ Feingold here, but the late primary hampered their efforts. Feingold, although polling somewhat close, has never looked significantly vulnerable, and has increased his lead throughout the campaign. He will cruise to a substantial victory and another term. Feingold by 16%.

    Republican pick-ups: GA, SC, NC, SD, LA, and FL
    Democratic pick-ups: IL, AK

    Well, that's it. Republicans look to gain a net 4 seats, to a new advantage of 55-45 (Jeffords counted as a Democrat, of course). As I've continually stressed, I've tried to be as objective as possible throughout the campaign season, and we'll see whether my predictions are more my hopes as a Republican, or the result of my analysis of the polls.

    'Twill be posted on FR momentarily. Please feel free to comment.

    8:43 PM Update: 'Tis here. Enjoy...

    8:54 PM Update: Nope. Stupid FR Mods moved it here. Not that you care...

    10:31 PM Update: Now here, hopefully to stay. Yeesh... Also, thanks for the heads-up on Mikulski. Just another case of journalistic sloppiness on my part...

    7:28 PM, 11/1 Update: This is when these predictions were supposed to be posted. Luckily I had the foresight to throw them out early, as, had I not, they likely wouldn't have gotten done (reference above post). Thanks for the heads-up on Senator Gregg, Dirk. How embarrassing...

    The Countdown has Begun...

    ...until Election Day. Many voters have already voted, and polls at this point are really rather worthless. I have several to post, then I'll do page updates, and my final predictions will be posted this evening.

    Firstly, I apologize. There was far too much partisan excitement in that Oklahoma post. Live with it.

    This post, though, will be devoid of partisan content. Now then, on to the polls!

    Zogby tracking results for 10/29:
  • Colorado: Salazar 50%, Coors 45%. Toss-up.
  • Florida: Martinez 46%, Castor 47%. Leaning Rep. takeover.
  • Wisconsin: Feingold 57%, Michels 37%. Safe Dem. retention.
  • Pennsylvania: Specter 57%, Hoeffel 28%. Safe Rep. retention.
  • Iowa: Grassley 70%, Small 24%. Safe Rep. retention.
  • Nevada: Reid 57%, Ziser 37%. Safe Dem. retention.
  • Ohio: Voinovich 59%, Fingerhut 32%. Safe Rep. retention.

  • UNH Tracking of New Hampshire: Gregg 63%, Haddock 22%. Safe Rep. retention.

  • In Louisiana, the Verne Kennedy tracking poll shows Vitter at 48%, John with 22%, and Kennedy with 13%. The standings for the Democratic challengers have been reversed, in the last tracking update, Kennedy was slightly leading John. Regardless, I still think Vitter will win without a run-off. Leaning Rep. takeover.

    Most of the other polls have been of un-competitive races:

  • In Georgia, a Zogby/Atlanta Journal-Constitution poll finds Isakson under 50% but still leading strongly, 49%-36%. Probably Rep. takeover.

  • In Illinois, a Research 2000 poll (as yet unreleased - RCP) shows the race holding steady at Obama 67%-Keyes 25%. Easy Dem. takeover.

  • In Connecticut, a Research 2000 poll shows incumbent Dodd leading 66%-27%. Safe Dem. retention.

  • Another New Hampshire poll, this one also from Research 2000 (RCP) shows Gregg ahead 68%-19%. Safe Rep. retention.

  • And, finally, a poll from Utah shows incumbent Bennett leading 61%-23%. Safe Rep. retention.

    That's all for now. Obligatory feedback link here.

    3:12 PM Update: All the pages are updated. I have some other stuff to do but should be wrapping up and posting my final predictions, as I said previously, tonight.